Declawing cats has become an increasingly controversial issue in the U.S. today, many states are trying to pass laws for it to become illegal.
Declawing may seem ethical and unharmful to some, while others think it is unethical and damaging to cats. The process is not just a makeover, it is a serious surgery! The procedure involves the removal of the last bone in the cats "toes" which ends in a long recovery for the cat.
As you could tell from the picture, it is a very serious surgery. Comparing the surgery to a human, would be like cutting off the last digit in your finger, ouch!
Not only is this an incredibly painful recovery for the cats, it can also alter their personalities to an extent. Many people to not know that cats tend to claw our valuables as a way to mark territory since they have scent glands in their paws, if their claws are removed, they tend to go with the other option of spraying urine onto valuables to mark their territory instead. This issue can be just as bad as them clawing. Also if the cat is an indoor cat, digging in their litter box can become quite uncomfortable without claws, so they might resort to doing their business elsewhere, which is not a good thing!
Cats claws are there for a purpose, they are a form of defense and actually help aide in muscle movements and muscle stretching. Many owners have discovered that their cats have now resorted to biting rather then scratching after their surgery. What's next, fang removal?
Personally I believe that declawing is unethical to an extent. When a cat is under the age of a year, or more specifically around 14-17 weeks of age, their claws are not fully developed into bone, they are just cartilage. This makes surgery, and recovery for the cat much easier. When the cat becomes older and that bone begins to form, is when the surgery is harder and the recovery is painful and takes longer to heal.
As mentioned before, many states have tried to pass bills to make declawing illegal, but none have actually passed. California is considered the most active state against declawing today. Though no states in the U.S. have made it illegal, many other countries have, including: England, Italy, France, Germany, Switzerland, Ireland, Japan and Australia.
On another closely related topic, is the docking or cutting of tails on cats and dogs. Many breeders like the look of the shorter tail, and claim that the animal has an easier life without a tail. Are we controlling our animals too much? Are these surgeries completely necessary for the well being of our animals?
Now I have a few questions. Do you think declawing and tail docking are ethical? Should the U.S. try and ban it?
Here is my link!
Declawing Controversy

I think you did an awesome job of bringing out specific reasons to back up why you think these animals should keep their claws. You have very strong arguments that are based on proof. I am not 100% opposed to certain surgeries, but only as a baby. I think it is inhuman to procrastinate and do this when they are adults, plus they have already become accustomed to using claws, etc. At least when they are little, that is just how they grow up and they learn to do thing differently. I feel that if people want to keep domesticated animals as pets, they should have to deal with what that animal naturally has. Humans can only make something conform perfectly to their standards in a limited manner.
ReplyDeleteI liked the article and the picture gave a nice visual of what actually happens. Great Job!
Great comments Magdalena.
ReplyDeleteI agree with a lot of the points you made- the both of you.
Good use of title and addressing the specific controversy.
Also, good job with the diagram.